I made the left border a little bit thicker in order to make it easy enough to click on.
i will get you revised icons ASAP ! :) what is the icon after the checkbox?
CREATE A SCRAPBOOK OF JUST ABOUT ANYTHING ONLINE
MetaNotes just makes me happy. And that is after all what I want in life.
“Hit F11 for full screen. Trust us.”
I love it!
“Because I can SAVE GAME on what I’m learning for later.”
Love it too!
Consider this—if we didn’t have a Federal Income Tax, the military-industrial complex would cease to exist, because they’d lose their source of income.

( source: warresisters.org )
My opinion is that the Federal Income Tax has allowed the US Government to get WAY WAY WAY too big and too powerful. It never should have existed, and even the way the IRS came into existence is suspicious.
It wasn’t that long ago that the US was a country with no federal income tax. Considering how much people (of all political persuasions) hate paying income tax, I find it hard to believe that the creation of the IRS was the will of the people.
As long as I’m not infringing on someone else’s freedom, I want to be able to do anything I want.
You have to keep searching until you can find a solution that doesn’t require coercion.
This is one of my core beliefs.
I refuse to do that to anyone.
I support Dennis Kucinich for president. I am confident that he would run the country for the benefit of its citizens, not for the benefit of global business. He is the only candidate whose values and goals I fully support. He also champions impeachment of Bush.
Why would I, as a Liberal, have anything favorable to say about a Republican such as Ron Paul?
I have fundamental disagreements with Ron Paul. I support a welfare state and the New Deal. He wants to weaken social security and medicare, in effect throwing the poor back on their own resources. He wants to abolish income tax, which would mean reliance on taxes that fall most heavily on the poor and let the rich off lightly. This would increase concentration of wealth, which is already dangerously excessive, and the poor would pay for it.
In ordinary times I would simply oppose a candidate with such views, but these are not ordinary times. The Bush regime has contempt for human rights, and most of the 2008 candidates are little better than Bush. Most voted for the disgraceful U. S.A.P. A.T. R.I.O.T. Act, which authorized the Bush regime to collect businesses’ (and even libraries’) records about individuals without a court order. Most of them voted to launch a war of aggression in Iraq, accepting Bush’s patent lies with the innocence of a sheltered child. Obama, who was not in the Senate when those were voted on, nonetheless does not convincingly oppose them.
Aside from Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul, those candidates that criticize the occupation of Iraq do not show a firm will to end it. They dwell on “mismanagement”, as if the worst you could say about Bush’s crime was that “he didn’t plan it well enough.”
The only Democratic or Republican candidate, aside from Kucinich, that clearly stands for human rights, democracy, and an end to torture, secret prisons and the occupation of Iraq is Ron Paul. I urge Republicans to support him for that party’s nomination.
copyright© 2007 Richard Stallman Verbatim copying and redistribution of this entire page are permitted provided this notice is preserved.
Srini—you’ve known me long enough to know that I have a preference for small systems. That aesthetic carries over into my politics, as well. Big government is like bloated code that lacks conciseness, and that’s ugly to me.
and i agree 100% that the source code of government is legacy spaghetti. so stallman and you disagree on ideology, and maybe i am somewhere in the middle. let me also say that i understand that stallman is perhaps a bit ideologically confused and is characterizing Paul as a more black and white character than he really is – perhaps Paul has a more nuanced view which takes some of Stallman’s points into consideration.
The income tax is used to pay back, with interest, the money we borrow from a private bank known as the Federal Reserve. There would be no national debt if we didn’t borrow. So, instead of borrowing, Ron Paul suggests we make our own money. You see, the government doesn’t make the money anymore ever since the Federal Reserve was established in 1913. The bigger question is, how can we AFFORD the IRS and the Federal Reserve? We became a world power without it – not with it.
( source: youtube comment by Rockstar97321 )
Thoughts? Have yet to hear an intelligent defense of such wingnut theses as Paul holds. This paragraph alone nixes him from my Christmas list :)
it’s just that this is a legacy nation and we are responsible for the welfare of less well adjusted people, if only because without a framework they may turn to crime :( poverty -> crime…
i support crazy people who want to start NEW societies. But crazy people who want to remake the existing society… well, that can skew either way.
That’s the way MetaNotes works – you’re going to have ALL THIS SPACE to explore within each document.
Let’s put the WIDE back into the WORLD WIDE WEB :)
One of my favorite things about the new era of the Web is the way people are just jumping onboard and creating cool stuff to entertain me :) I mean seriously, there’s so much out there that who doesn’t feel overwhelmed?
...just like Google Maps.
thank you.
we need an integrated chat in here or something.
the icons after the checkbox are supposed to represent:
we can pick different icons—I’m not attached to any of them.
we can do better than the tag board.
Login | Create an Account |